ALTAS HABILIDADES E SUPERDOTAÇÃO - NURODIVERGÊNCIAS DIAGNOSTICO INFANCIA E ASTROLOGIA

A Short Symbolic Astrological Narrative of Jesus Christ (Emmanuel) In the ancient world, the sky was read as a language of meaning rather than a machine of calculation. Birth charts were symbolic images, expressing purpose and role rather than destiny in a literal sense. When this symbolic approach is applied to the figure of Jesus, the aim is not historical proof, but understanding why his story took the form it did and why it continues to resonate across time. With Aquarius rising, the narrative begins with an outsider, someone who does not fully belong to the established order. This placement suggests a life that challenges power not through force, but through ideas that quietly undermine rigid systems. Ruled by Uranus, this beginning carries the energy of awakening and rupture, shifting authority away from law and hierarchy toward conscience and inner truth. At the core of this identity stands Saturn retrograde in Pisces in the first house, describing a life shaped by inner responsibility and compassion. Suffering is not imposed, but accepted, turning the body itself into an instrument of empathy and sacrifice. This is a path of endurance, humility, and conscious limitation. The Moon placed in the first house before sunset reveals that the collective comes before the individual. The expectations, hopes, and pain of the people shape the mission before personal will is fully formed. Born between day and night, this figure lives between worlds, responding instinctively to human suffering. The Sun in Virgo in the seventh house, joined with Pluto, places healing and service in direct confrontation with power. The hands that heal also expose what authority prefers to hide, making conflict with rulers and religious institutions inevitable. The opposition between the Sun and Saturn forms an axis of martyrdom, where worldly success becomes impossible without betraying the deeper purpose of the life. A full Moon in Pisces with retrograde Jupiter expands faith, miracles, and collective devotion, yet also reveals how belief rooted in projection can be unstable. Crowds gather quickly, but fear and doubt may follow just as fast. Teaching unfolds through Mercury in Libra, explaining the use of parables, gentle speech, and indirect wisdom. Truth is not imposed, but offered, placing moral responsibility in the listener’s hands. Action, when it comes, appears through Mars in Scorpio as deliberate, symbolic courage rather than impulsive violence. The ethical heart of the message is expressed through Venus in Libra in the eighth house, where love becomes a path of surrender and transformation. Justice moves beyond external rules toward radical forgiveness and inner renewal, accepting loss and change as necessary steps toward truth. Public destiny unfolds under a Sagittarian Midheaven, while humble roots remain grounded in a Gemini foundation of simple speech and everyday life. As the story approaches death, eighth-house and Neptunian symbolism reframes the end as transformation rather than annihilation, allowing meaning to continue beyond physical form. Throughout the journey, the Moon in Pisces also reflects the maternal presence of Mary, embodying acceptance, silent faith, and the ability to hold mystery without explanation. In the end, this symbolic astrological narrative describes not a conqueror, but a life shaped by conscious sacrifice, where historical defeat becomes spiritual revelation and power is redefined through compassion rather than control

The Birth of Jesus Christ and Astrology: A Historical–Critical Survey of Proposed Natal Charts from Antiquity to the Present (*) Abstract Over the past two millennia, the birth of Jesus Christ has been interpreted primarily through theological and liturgical frameworks. Nevertheless, from Late Antiquity to contemporary astrology, many authors have tried to reconstruct the natal chart of Jesus using biblical clues, astronomical phenomena, and astrological symbolic systems. This article presents a critical and comparative survey of the main proposals about the date, time, and astrological configuration of Jesus’s birth, encompassing Western tropical astrology, Hellenistic astrology, sidereal astrology, Jyotish (Vedic astrology), and modern esoteric interpretations. Rather than defending a single “true” date, the aim is to map the interpretive field, its symbolic assumptions, and its historical limitations, offering the reader a solid, accessible, and academically grounded overview. ________________________________________ 1. Introduction: Between Historical Silence and Symbolic Desire The canonical Gospels do not provide an exact date for the birth of Jesus Christ. The narratives of Matthew and Luke have symbolic elements—the Star, the Magi, the reign of Herod, the shepherds, the census—but lack sufficient chronological data for precise astronomical calculation. The establishment of December 25 as the date of Christmas was a late liturgical decision, combined between the third and fourth centuries, in close dialogue with solar festivals of the Roman Empire, such as Sol Invictus. Even so, the presence of the Star of Bethlehem in the biblical narrative opened space, from an early stage, for astronomical and astrological interpretations. If a celestial sign could be read by the Magi—traditionally associated with Chaldean astrology—then a fundamental question arises: what kind of sky was this? From this question appeared a wide range of attempts to reconstruct the natal chart of Jesus, each reflecting not only astronomical data but also the symbolic, theological, and cultural imagination of its time. ________________________________________ 2. Astrology, Christianity, and Historical Prohibitions It is essential to recognize that for much of the Middle Ages, astrology applied to the figure of Christ was viewed with suspicion or outright rejection. Christian doctrine emphasized free will, divine providence, and the uniqueness of the Incarnation, making it problematic to subject Jesus to an astrological “destiny.” Patristic authors such as Augustine of Hippo strongly criticized deterministic astrology, associating it with paganism. For this reason, no reliable natal charts of Jesus produced in early Christian Antiquity or the Middle Ages have survived that are comparable to horoscopes cast for kings or historical figures. Astrological interest in Jesus’s birth appears more clearly only in the modern period, when astrology undergoes reinterpretation as a symbolic, psychological, and historical language. ________________________________________ 3. The December 25 Tradition: Symbolism Rather Than Astronomy Before examining alternative proposals, it is important to clarify the status of December 25. Astronomically, it falls just after the winter solstice in the Northern Hemisphere, the moment when the Sun symbolically “rebirths” after reaching its lowest declination. From a theological perspective, the association between Christ and the Sun—lux mundi—is symbolically coherent. However, no astronomical or historical evidence supports this date as factual. Astrologically, a birth with the Sun in early Capricorn could symbolize authority, structure, and law, but such interpretations are retrospective projections, not conclusions drawn from ancient sources. ________________________________________ 4. The Great Conjunctions and the 7 BCE Hypothesis One of the most influential hypotheses links the Star of Bethlehem to the triple conjunction of Jupiter and Saturn in Pisces, which occurred in 7 BCE. This phenomenon has been extensively studied by modern astronomers and astrologers. 4.1 Heinz Sandauer The Austrian astrologer Heinz Sandauer proposed that Jesus was born on September 17, 7 BCE, at dusk, in the region of Judea. His chart places the Sun in Virgo and emphasizes symbolic themes of service, sacrifice, and spiritual mission. The Jupiter–Saturn conjunction in Pisces is interpreted as a messianic sign within the astrological imagination of the time, since Jupiter symbolized kingship and Saturn tradition and law. Sandauer read this chart as deeply consistent with the Christian narrative: a humble messiah, devoted to service, destined for redemptive suffering. 4.2 Hellenistic and Jewish Astrological Readings In ancient astrological geography, Pisces was associated with regions of the Levant, including Judea. Thus, a rare conjunction of slow-moving planets in this sign could indeed have been interpreted by Eastern astrologers as signaling the birth of a spiritual leader in that land. ________________________________________ 5. The Narrative Proposal of J. J. Benítez The Spanish writer J. J. Benítez, in his series Operation Trojan Horse, proposed a highly specific date: August 21, 7 BCE, at 11:43 a.m., in Bethlehem. Although presented within a speculative and literary framework, this proposal has influenced many contemporary astrologers. The resulting chart features: • Scorpio rising • Sun in Leo on the Midheaven • Strong emphasis on Water signs Astrologically, it is a chart of intense symbolic power, combining spiritual leadership (Leo) with themes of death, transformation, and rebirth (Scorpio). From an academic perspective, however, it stays a speculative construction without verifiable documentary support. ________________________________________ 6. Revelation as a Celestial Map: Ernest L. Martin A distinctive approach was proposed by the biblical researcher Ernest L. Martin, who interpreted chapter 12 of the Book of Revelation as a literal astronomical description. According to Martin, the image of the “woman clothed with the Sun, with the Moon under her feet” corresponds to a rare configuration in which: • The Sun is positioned in the middle of the constellation Virgo • The Moon appears near the “feet” of the constellation He found this configuration on September 11, 3 BCE, at sunset, visible in Palestine. This hypothesis is among the most widely discussed academically, as it relies on verifiable astronomical calculations. Astrologically, the Virgo symbolism is clear, although the literal reading of an apocalyptic text stays controversial. ________________________________________ 7. The Astronomical Hypothesis of Michael Molnar The astronomer Michael R. Molnar proposed that the Star of Bethlehem was not a bright visible star but a technical astrological event: the lunar occultation of Jupiter on April 17, 6 BCE, in the sign of Aries. In Hellenistic symbolism: • Jupiter = kingship • Aries = a sign associated with Judea • Occultations = Royal portents Molnar argues that professional astrologers would have recognized this event as signaling the birth of a king, even if nothing extraordinary was visible to the general public. His proposal does not construct a full natal chart but offers one of the most historically consistent explanations for the account of the Magi. ________________________________________ 8. Vedic Astrology and Sidereal Proposals Within Jyotish (Vedic astrology), some modern authors have tried to reconstruct Jesus’s birth using the sidereal zodiac and criteria of spiritual Yogas. 8.1 Francis R. Day The Australian Vedic astrologer Francis R. Day proposed September 10, 3 BCE, around 5:23 a.m., in Bethlehem. His chart features a sidereal Virgo ascendant with multiple planets close to the horizon, forming configurations associated with enlightenment, service, and liberation (moksha). This approach dialogues interestingly with Christian symbolism, though it depends heavily on assumptions specific to the Vedic system. ________________________________________ 9. Modern Esoteric Readings: Edgar Cayce The American mystic Edgar Cayce claimed, while in trance, that Jesus was born on March 19 or December 24–25, treating both as equivalent due to calendar discrepancies. From an academic standpoint, these readings are classified as mystical rather than historical, yet they exerted significant influence on twentieth-century spiritual culture. ________________________________________ 10. Critical Comparison of the Proposals This overview reveals a fundamental point: each proposed chart reflects the symbolic system of its author more than an objective historical truth. Even so, recurrent patterns emerge: • Emphasis on Virgo, Pisces, Leo, or Aries • Centrality of Jupiter as a royal planet • Attempts to reconcile humility with kingship • A search for coherence between the heavens and the Gospel narrative No proposal can be regarded as definitive. Nevertheless, some—such as those of Molnar and Martin—prove greater historical and astronomical consistency, while others run primarily within symbolic, literary, or spiritual domains. ________________________________________ 11. Conclusion The multiplicity of astrological charts proposed for the birth of Jesus Christ should not be seen as a problem, but as a revealing cultural phenomenon. Each attempt to reconstruct the sky of Jesus’s birth tells us less about the “exact day” of that event and more about how different eras understood the relationship between cosmos, history, and spiritual meaning. From ancient astrological imagination to modern interdisciplinary research, the figure of Jesus continues to function as a symbolic axis around which theology, astronomy, and astrology intersect. For contemporary readers, these charts are not instruments of faith, but documents of imagination, symbolism, and cultural history—an invitation to reflect on humanity’s enduring search for meaning in the sky. ________________________________________ Keywords: Jesus Christ; Star of Bethlehem; historical astrology; natal charts; Christianity and astrology; ancient astronomy. (*) Internet research done by IA chatGPT5.2 in 22nd December 2025. Content Curation: Nando Guimarães, astrokabana, Brazil. e-mail: zody2k@aol.com

above is an exemple of a face of a man with Virgo Sun and Aquarius ascendant. Celebrity: Billy Ray Cyrus.

blogspot ASTROKABANA zody2k@aol.com = email GUIMARAES fernando = facebook @nandoastrokabana = instagram